It was a rare treat to see back-to-back great good education sense from a Marxist and a neoliberal.
I subscribe to Freddie DeBoer, and a friend gifted me a subscription to Matt Yglesias (not as Ed). Matt’s insufferable narcissist intern Milan kept me from subbing; after that tenure ended I might have paid up–but then Matt blocked me on Twitter for mocking his NIMBY/YIMBY to socks analogy so oh, well. I still read him and have been for lord, close to 25 years, even though his two pet issues would result in a billion immigrants living in cramped housing built against the will of the local communities now suffering from increased traffic and decreased quality of life.
Freddie’s so far left that I think my head would explode if I knew enough about Marxism to object, and I’m pretty sure he agrees with Matt on both YIMBYism and immigration, but I admire him tremendously for rebuilding his life after a terrible breakdown that happened all over social media.
Both are excellent on education. Strong recommend on Freddie’s book Cult of Smart and his essay Education Doesn’t Work but honestly, just search his substack for “education” and you’ll find all sorts of interesting work.
While Freddie has been consistent on education for a decade or more, Matt used to be standard reformist Dem on education: anti unions, pro-charters (but a voucher skeptic) teachers mostly suck, who cares if they quit, and so on. And he still writes nonsense occasionally that I rant about. But overall, he registered the “strange death of education reform” (parts one, two, three, four, and five) and appears to have adjusted his views towards realism. Yay.
(Not to brag or anything, but Freddie cites my work on the history of ed reform and Matt says I’m correct that parents, not teachers or policy, is why schools stayed closed.)
Anyway it was a real pleasure to see both writers within a week come up with articles stating truths that go unacknowledged by any writer less publicly reviled than Steve Sailer.
Matt states affirmatively that the US’s education system does a good job. Freddie argues that no one has a clear definition of success for the education system. Strong statements in a world where “education system” is universally preceded with the adjective “failed”. Naturally, both articles have been completely ignored by the mainstream media.
I wanted to do something to celebrate, but what should I do? Link them in and say wow, I totally agree?
It was their agreements that led me to a topic. Matt casually acknowledges Freddie’s main point, that we don’t have a clear vision of success. Both mention in passing that we spend a fortune on education.
So I thought I’d drill down.
Matt observes that education is subject to Baumol’s cost disease, that the increasing expense of teachers and other staff is a cause of the expense. Freddie just mentions the lousy cost benefit ratio from our spending.
Neither mentions two enormous factors in education spending. First up and best documented: special education, enforced by IDEA, the federal law mandating states provide a free and appropriate education for all disabled students. When I wrote that article nine years ago, special education costs per student were roughly half again as much as general ed students. That’s almost certainly gone up since then. California, for example, spends almost three times as much on the average special education student. In 2018, New York spent 30% of its classroom instruction budget on special ed, another number that’s only certainly gotten worse. The federal government hasn’t come anywhere near its commitment to fund 40% of special ed expenses, and states vary on their spending depending on how aggressive parent lawsuits have been (the parents are almost always supported by the courts, up to and including the Supreme Court), finding a total national cost on special education is difficult, but everyone agrees it’s a lot.
The money is almost entirely wasted in terms of educational results. Special ed law originated before medical advances kept children alive in conditions we never anticipated. Imagine just one severely disabled child born at 25 weeks, blind, wheelchair bound, incontinent, and destined to life institutionalization. That child will need an expensive wheelchair, transportation, at least two paras, at a cost of what–$100K or more? Now multiply by what, 100,000 kids? Fewer? more? Now move up the disability chain to kids who can walk, can make it to the bathroom with an escort, but and can’t be put in a classroom without two full-time paras and they’ll disrupt the classroom every day. Or the kids who are locked in an autistic world, screaming if touched. There are still several steps up the chain until you get to the merely low cognitive ability students, the “mildly retarded” as they used to be called, the Downs Syndrome children that IDEA was originally intended to support.Then there’s the ADA which created educational and medical disabilities that allowed a huge pool of kids and their parents to make absurd demands that don’t actually do any good.
Special education mandates warring between the kids who need institutionalizing and the kids who could claim extreme risk from covid played a significant role in school decisions to open or close schools–mostly keeping them closed.
The other big cost bucket is immigrant education, a number even harder to pin down. Most analyses of these costs just say well, there’s X new kids and each kid costs Y. But that ignores the history of ELL mandates, requiring districts to create ELL classes no matter how small for students dropped into our system with no English and often with very little formal education.
So then just count the expense of ELL students, right? No, because the majority of ELL students are American citizens, many of who have parents who foolishly checked “Yes” on the question about “is another language spoken at home” when registering their kids for kindergarten. Once a kid is flagged ELL, they have to test out and the test standard is pretty high. Many–and I mean well over 50%–of long term ELL kids are second or even third generation citizens who just aren’t very bright and whose first language is English but whose parents or grandparents speak another language.
These students–again, a clear majority–are lumped in with the new arrivals. But the newbies come in a wild variety as well. Some of them–not many, but they exist–are students who attended school in their home country. Many even learned English and speak it fluently. Doesn’t matter. They’re put in ELL classes. ( I spent several months trying to get four kids from China, Vietnam, and Salvador with reading scores higher than our school’s average out of ELL classes and failed.) A larger number come as immigrant students as very young children and learn English organically. If they have reasonable IQs, they’ll test out early. A still larger number learns English but never have the intellect to test out. Still others show up in high school, often with very little formal education, with parents who frankly weren’t planning on putting them in school but rather putting them to work to pay off the coyotes.**
So how much do they cost? No one really knows and there’s very little interest in finding out for fear of pissing off a public already disenchanted with our immigration policy. If the ELL law sounds crazy, it’s essential to understand the law was written assuming we’d have only Spanish speaking ELL students–ironic, since the first ELL Supreme Court decision was about a Chinese American citizen.
Even though ELL students are mostly citizens, the non-English speaking contingent coming from other countries cost a hell of a lot and they keep on coming, both legal and illegal. Thank Plyler vs Doe, denying states the right to refuse education to illegal immigrants–without it, I wonder if eventually states would have sought to deny education to legal immigrants as well. Just as medical advancements and the ADA expanded the mandate of IDEA, so too did Plyler fail to anticipate the impact of Hart-Celler and Simpson-Mazzoli, to say nothing of the political class’s determination to increase legal immigration and refuse to police the border for decades. Recently, there have been more stories of the impact of immigrants on public schools, but this has been going on for decades, with all immigrants, not just the undocumented.
Most people simply don’t understand how huge these buckets of spending are because, well, it’s one of those areas where interest groups, the media,and politicians all have incentives to make it difficult to identify just how much money is spent. Even once you find out, who wants to argue that we’re spending too much education money on newly arrived immigrants and kids who will live their lives in diapers?
But like both Freddie and Matt said: We spend a lot of money and we don’t have a clear vision of success. I’m pretty sure they both were referring to “success” in terms of educable American students, ensuring opportunities regardless of economic status, helping students achieve to the best of their ability (or ignoring that ability, as our current law requires).
There lie the blank areas I’m trying to fill in.
Do most people count “success” as ensuring a student’s diaper gets changed twice a day? Do they count it as “success” when violent students are pulled off teachers or paras before serious damage is done–or before the student shoots the teacher? Or how about we count a win when special ed resource teachers put out thirty boiler plate “individualized education plans” in a year? Or when a parent threatens to sue unless the district pays for private school for their child–and the Supreme Court backs them up? Are schools successful when they drag reluctant Afghan refugees through a few years of school without learning English or moving their skills beyond the third grade level, or when they keep kids who speak no English sitting mutely in elective courses because they can’t understand English enough to sit in academic courses and have no interest in learning?
Our education system spends billions on poorly defined mandates that don’t comport to achieving success as most Americans would (naively) define it.
American educational costs and objectives have ballooned out of control in ways that the public doesn’t understand, in no small part because the mandates originated at a time when the problems addressed were a tiny blip compared to the….Himalayan mountain ranges they represent today.
So three cheers to Freddie and Matt for giving our education system the credit it deserves. Hopefully one day the polity will demand control over the ballooning costs and responsibilities in areas that play at best a tangential role in what most consider education “success”.