- Mike Petrilli on Duncan’s Iowa rejection
- High School Exit Exam Support comes too late, says this Edweek story. In my experience, high school exit exam support works very well if done properly. Elimination strategies will get all students to the finish line. Most teachers persist in explaining how to work the problem, rather than how to eliminate answers. This is insane, since any student who could learn how to work the problem wouldn’t have failed the CAHSEE in the first place.
- Teacher misconduct law defeated: I do not understand why everyone is so shocked by this. Clearly, any teacher who is actually charged and found guilty will lose his job. If the legal system can’t convict, then clearly, some ambiguity exists. I guess I’ve seen too many students ready and willing to get teachers in trouble to support wholeheartedly any effort to bypass protections when the legal system had its bite at the apple. I do like this Ken Feinberg proposal, though.
- Kids eat better when teachers and parents participate: is there any more monumental waste of time than the endless and doomed effort at food propaganda? Keerist. Let the kids have their damn dingdongs and Doritos.
- Dumbing down the GPA–this article is misnamed and confusing. A school district is doing away with GPA weight for honors and AP classes. I’m not going to give my take on this yet, it requires a longer post. But it’s not “dumbing down” GPAs, but narrowing the distribution. And the article says the school officials argue that “colleges don’t look at GPAs, just courses taken”, which is arrant nonsense.
- Charter School Voted Down because of “Segregation Fears” (quotes mine): Let this be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Charter schools might theoretically be for everyone, but in reality, they exist to allow organizations to cream motivated African Americans and Hispanics in a calm environment so the achievement gap won’t look so grim.
Thanks to Alexander Russo and Stephen Sawchuk for the tweets.
June 29th, 2012 at 4:03 pm
“(Charter schools) exist to allow organizations to cream motivated African Americans and Hispanics in a calm environment so the achievement gap won’t look so grim.” That’s a huge jump from the article to this conclusion. Doesn’t it really say more about letting school districts act as gatekeepers? In SC, we have a statewide “school district” for charter schools. Some, not all, charter schools are authorized this way.
June 29th, 2012 at 7:11 pm
You don’t think your statewide school district would find itself being sued for disparate impact if it opened a bunch of charter schools that didn’t nothing but cater to white suburbans? Count me as deeply skeptical.
June 30th, 2012 at 12:57 am
Your original point was that charter schools are used to “cream” minorities. That’s overreach. You moved the bar in your reply.
July 1st, 2012 at 1:40 am
No, my point was to point out the difference between theory and reality. Hence the word “theoretically”.